<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbird email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chasingdaisy.com/2006/03/23/thunderbird-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chasingdaisy.com/2006/03/23/thunderbird-email/</link>
	<description>A little bit of this, a little bit of that...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:27:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: daisy</title>
		<link>http://chasingdaisy.com/2006/03/23/thunderbird-email/#comment-8272</link>
		<dc:creator>daisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasingdaisy.com/?p=2042#comment-8272</guid>
		<description>Oooh, is that you being masterful Gordon? ;-) I will try, *gulp*.

Croila, I do love Thunderbird. I don&#039;t mind Outlook (2003 or Express) but as Richard said, it does such a good job of spam assassination that I&#039;d find it hard to switch back to an M$ product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, is that you being masterful Gordon? ;-) I will try, *gulp*.</p>
<p>Croila, I do love Thunderbird. I don&#8217;t mind Outlook (2003 or Express) but as Richard said, it does such a good job of spam assassination that I&#8217;d find it hard to switch back to an M$ product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://chasingdaisy.com/2006/03/23/thunderbird-email/#comment-8271</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasingdaisy.com/?p=2042#comment-8271</guid>
		<description>I use Thunderbird mainly because it&#039;s &quot;lighter&quot; than Outlook. I use Outlook 2003 at work and now CANNOT live without LABELS...

Daisy. Delete the emails you don&#039;t need. Not archive, DELETE. FOREVER. Honest... try it... if it&#039;s THAT crucial you can find the info again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Thunderbird mainly because it&#8217;s &#8220;lighter&#8221; than Outlook. I use Outlook 2003 at work and now CANNOT live without LABELS&#8230;</p>
<p>Daisy. Delete the emails you don&#8217;t need. Not archive, DELETE. FOREVER. Honest&#8230; try it&#8230; if it&#8217;s THAT crucial you can find the info again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://chasingdaisy.com/2006/03/23/thunderbird-email/#comment-8269</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasingdaisy.com/?p=2042#comment-8269</guid>
		<description>I use Thunderbird and I find the spam filter is pretty effective. Though I would like a bit more control over what happens to spam emails. I also like the way it detects phishing scam emails and displays a warning for the unwary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Thunderbird and I find the spam filter is pretty effective. Though I would like a bit more control over what happens to spam emails. I also like the way it detects phishing scam emails and displays a warning for the unwary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Croila</title>
		<link>http://chasingdaisy.com/2006/03/23/thunderbird-email/#comment-8261</link>
		<dc:creator>Croila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasingdaisy.com/?p=2042#comment-8261</guid>
		<description>What do you honestly think of Thunderbird? I didn&#039;t find its much lauded spam filter was any good at all. After using it for about a year, I gave in eventually and started using MS Outlook 2003, which I absolutely love now. I&#039;m all for open source, but the spam filter just didn&#039;t work for me :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you honestly think of Thunderbird? I didn&#8217;t find its much lauded spam filter was any good at all. After using it for about a year, I gave in eventually and started using MS Outlook 2003, which I absolutely love now. I&#8217;m all for open source, but the spam filter just didn&#8217;t work for me :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

